Response to a Nasty Mailer
On July 18th, you may have received a mailer from the WY Freedom PAC, a group created by the Freedom Caucus and to whom my opponent is beholden. This mailer exemplifies the caustic approach they bring to the legislature and illustrates their tendency to avoid accuracy, favoring inference and innuendo. If re-elected, my votes will remain fact-based, pragmatic, and focused on our district.
Let’s clear the air and dissect their claims - then you decide if I need to retire.
1. The Claim: I “voted with the radical left to remove Trump from the ballot” with reference to HB0001 and footnote #1, which is page 9 of the proposed budget.
Response: I support President Donald J Trump, as the Republican Party nominee, to appear on the ballot - and President Trump will appear on the ballot. That was never in question in the state of Wyoming. What I do not support are statewide elected officials wasting your hard-earned money, without oversight, on unnecessary lawsuits that do nothing more than make a political statement. More specifically, we required the Secretary of State to get legislative approval to spend state funds to start or participate in lawsuits outside of Wyoming, where the state and/or the Secretary of State is not a named party in the lawsuit. Lack of oversight and frivolous spending on issues that aren’t directly associated with the responsibilities of a statewide elected official isn’t something I can stand behind. That’s just not how we do things in Wyoming.
2. The Claim: I “Voted ‘NO’ – to stop Chinese Communists from owning land in Wyoming” with reference to the vote on SF0102 Foreign Property Ownership-critical infrastructure.
Response: SF0102 was poorly crafted and impractical, and would have caused undue burden on County Clerks. Worse, it would have failed to protect our critical infrastructure from adversaries because it would have overwhelmed our county officials with unattainable expectations. It was a bad bill that would have led to bad outcomes.
Instead I supported SF0077 - Homeland defense-infrastructure reporting and investigating, which addresses critical infrastructure security more effectively than SF0102 while not overburdening County Clerks and not damaging job and revenue-producing trona, oil and gas industries. Additionally, I am now serving on a Joint Appropriations Committee workgroup convened to develop legislation to address additional infrastructure security gaps. Wyoming’s critical infrastructure safety is extremely important to me - but so is good legislation that makes sense. Wyoming citizens understand and respect independent thought, and that’s exactly what I’m practicing in my continued efforts around this important topic. Blindly following “group think” isn’t who we are in Wyoming, but the WY Freedom Caucus believes it’s their way or the highway. I would recommend they avoid telling Wyomingites what to do, who they can talk to, work with, or how to think. That is NOT the Wyoming way.
3. The Claim: I “Voted ‘NO’ to stop illegal aliens from using their out-of-state driver’s licenses as ID” with reference to SF0120 Driver’s licenses – unauthorized alien restrictions.
Response: This deceitful claim makes it sound like I support illegal aliens voting in our elections. Nothing could be further from the truth. As a citizen’s legislature often there isn’t enough time to bring every bill to the floor, especially during a Budget Session, which only provides one month for legislators to review, debate, and vote for Wyoming laws. The only vote this bill received was on its priority relative to other, more pressing legislation. I voted “no” to moving it to a different committee so we could instead work on bills that had a more direct impact on you, the residents of our great state.
4. The Claim: I “Voted ‘NO’ to cap property tax increase at 4%’ referring to HB0045- Property tax exemption-residential structures and land, but more specifically an obscure amendment to this bill, rather than the bill generally.
Response: I am a co-sponsor of this bill which was passed into legislation by a unanimous vote in the House, and I was present for that vote. The claim of a “NO ”vote to capping property tax is patently false. Instead, this claim digs into a vote on a minor amendment, which failed. The final vote on the bill included a 4% cap, and I voted AYE. Playing games with votes and spinning stories to smear opposing candidates on minor amendments to score political points is a sad commentary on how the WY Freedom Caucus attacks its fellow legislators. Again, not a Wyoming way of doing things.
Four claims, each misleading at best and purposely false at worst. The bright side: if these are the most concerning claims that the WY Freedom PAC could tabulate against my work in the legislature, then I think it’s clear that my good work for this district is moving the state forward overall. What is also clear is that the WY Freedom PAC would appear to endorse a candidate that wants to expand the scope and costs of state government (Claim 1); bring additional Federal government oversight into the lives of private Wyoming citizens (Claim 2); increase costs to the State through a longer legislative session and/or follow the rules only when it benefits them personally (Claim 3); and lie to get what they want (Claim 4).
The flier asks who I represent. I represent you - proud, independent, and free thinking Wyoming citizens of Fremont County. Not the Freedom Caucus. When I arrive in Cheyenne I’m not beholden to out-of-county or out-of-state interests. I don’t isolate myself, and avoid tough debates or conversations - even with people whose ideals may differ from mine. I vote for what is in the best interests of the people I represent. I vote for you. The question I ask of you is this: will you vote for me, or for the unethical spin and group-think of the WY Freedom Caucus?